Boz Saint John Reminds Sutton Stracke: You Don’t Own the Success Built on Your Ex’s Wallet

Boz Saint John Spills the Tea on RHOBH Drama, Dorit’s Breakup & Kyle's Coldness

In the world of Real Housewives, nothing is off-limits. Whether it’s a comment about a friend’s marriage, a jab at someone’s business, or an accidental revelation about personal finances, the claws come out quickly—and the burns can last a lifetime. But when Sutton Stracke threw a casual comment about Dorit Kemsley’s wallet, it wasn’t just a low blow. It was a statement that hit right at the heart of Dorit’s vulnerability and Boz Saint John was left unimpressed.

Boz Saint John Reminds Sutton Stracke: You Don’t Own the Success Built on Your Ex’s Wallet

Sutton Stracke is no stranger to controversy. Known for her straight-talking, sometimes sharp-witted remarks, Sutton can be both charming and confrontational. However, when she made an off-hand comment about Dorit’s wallet, many thought she went too far.

According to Boz Saint John, Sutton’s comment wasn’t cool. Speaking to Entertainment Tonight, Boz said, “It was a way to show that she’s better than Dorit,” Boz explains. And there’s more to the story than a simple comment about money.

“Dorit is in a tough spot. Her estranged husband sent her this huge, long email talking about finances and how Dorit was going to be responsible for things,” Boz reveals.

Boz Saint John Reminds Sutton Stracke: You Don’t Own the Success Built on Your Ex’s Wallet

The truth is, Sutton’s brand of “honesty” can sometimes feel more like an attack than a well-intentioned critique. “It was a way to dig in a vulnerable spot,” Boz says, “in a way that says, yeah, I’m better than you.” 

But Boz wasn’t impressed by Sutton’s approach. “She talks about her businesses, that she is more successful—all that stuff,” she says. “Girl, please don’t brag unless you have like a solid cement house. She’s lucky I didn’t do it at that table. Let’s not talk about wallets that don’t belong to you, and let’s not talk about successes that don’t belong to you.

Boz is insinuating that Sutton’s financial success isn’t purely the result of her own hard work, but rather a legacy left to her by her ex-husband—something she herself has openly discussed on the show.

Do you think Boz has a point?

Related posts

Garcelle Beauvais Explains Her Shocking Exit From ‘RHOBH’ Reunion: “They’re All F*ing Aholes”

Kyle Richards Opens Up About the Role Social Media Played in Her Split from Mauricio Umansky

Garcelle Beauvais Responds to Critics Saying She’s “Changed” After Leaving Real Housewives of Beverly Hills

34 comments

Evil Queen March 6, 2025 - 7:41 am
This is why I have issues with Big Boz! She is so far up Dorit’s ass that she doesn’t know which day it is! Since Dorit & PK’s first season there have been numerous stories about their finances or lack there of. Secondly, Yes, Big Boz is correct. Sutton didn’t physically-fiscally create that wealth working a 9-5 job but her & Christain have been together since age 13. They dated & were married for 18 year & Sutton stayed home. ..Rearing their children and encouraging Christian to reach for the stars like most wives-moms do. In my eyes, she earned that money. Yes, the wallet comment was stupid and I’m starting to believe that production is probably behind it . Moving on….lets discuss Big Boz’s cheap ugly earrings!!! WTH are those things…..hair scrunches and mini red life preserves for ones ?!
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 6, 2025 - 2:22 pm
I'm going with orange loofah sponges that she picked up with those lashes at the Dollar Tree. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b081682ff1dbff02c8275299a6aa966f0a58ab8d61fc4964b28fd8c1105b781a.png
Evil Queen March 7, 2025 - 7:50 am
Exactly ??. More like the 50% rack at Dollar Tree ?! ????.
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 5, 2025 - 2:34 pm
Bozo should probably just stay out of the conversation, because from what I've seen so far, it's unlikely that her alleged success was based solely on merit. I mean we are talking Netflix here, who is so woke, they make Bravo look like the Christian Broadcast Network. Nope, from where I'm sitting, there's not a "Bethenny Frankel" (a woman who truly did it ALL on her own) in the group. Kyle probably comes close, but Mo' did all the work. Also, it could be argued that Mo' got his start because his wife is the sister-in-law of a Hilton who gave him his start in real estate. Yes Kunty did well, but we know that was on Tom's ($20M dollar) wallet. Personally, I'm not disparaging any of them, because in my mind they were partners with their husbands. At the end of the day, they're all living the good life, and to make it in CA is a feat in itself, so cheers to that!~.
BC March 5, 2025 - 6:34 pm
Thank you Boz! Saying exactly what I was thinking. Sutton is vile and bangs on about her "business" aka a shop financed by her husband's alimony payments. Bye girl. She married lucky, end of story.
sbud March 5, 2025 - 5:39 pm
She just raised his children. Boz is getting on my nerves
BC March 5, 2025 - 6:38 pm
So she raised his children? Literally anybody could have done that.
Evil Queen March 7, 2025 - 7:55 am
Me too. I applaud her success but she isn’t all that. She’s really starting to test the limits of my meds. ?
Steve March 5, 2025 - 3:30 pm
The fact that Dorit's finances are her vulnerable spot (and always has been it seems to me) says a lot about how dubious her claims to wealth are. Neither she nor PK (or the two together) have ever had a lot of cash much less assets except for when they have borrowed the money or have grifted for it. Dorit's wealth is a mirage.
Zap It March 5, 2025 - 11:11 am
Let it rip, Boz. For Sutton or Tilly or anyone to brag about how much money they have when it all came from a successful ex husband makes me laugh. Now if they were self made and earned it themselves they would definitely have bragging rights and the respect that goes with it. Boz nailed it again.
ontoiran March 5, 2025 - 1:11 pm
Tilly's relationship backstory is a very interesting one... she had a successful career at the time she married boyfriend Sam Simon a budding yet unemployed cartoon artists in 1984, whom she supported until he got his " The Simpsons" break. They were/are very generous with their money, which neither had much of. they were/are admirers and collectors of expensive art, it is an investment for folks at that level, hence those one-of-a-kind designer pieces she sports. As for Sutton, hasn't she explained numerous times her X was a college boyfriend who wasn't successful or rich when they married? I'm not one to count other ppls money and don't care how they spend what they have. Trying to make these women out to be gold diggers is not a good look for the Boss Woman.
Zap It March 5, 2025 - 3:14 pm
So, no one said they're gold diggers. But they are women who are not self made. They married men who went on to be very successful and then received hefty settlements when they divorced. That's where their money comes from and that doesn't give them the same bragging rights as those women who are self made and went out and conquered their professions and made a lot of money doing so. That's just a fact. And should Dorit receive a hefty financial settlement when she divorces, which is unlikely, the same will apply to her. The only person counting other ppls money on that show is Sutton. You know, the one with the big wallet. Not Boz.
Champagne Hangover March 5, 2025 - 4:08 pm
Conquered at what price, though? Who was tending to their kids, running their homes? ? Hired hands? And no, I don’t and never will buy into the moronic ‘girl boss’ bullsh*t that says women can always just have it all. No, they cannot and likely a good 90% of them don’t, despite deceptive optics. Either family or career will suffer and guess which one it almost inevitably does? ?Nothing about THAT to be proud of. https://media2.giphy.com/media/l0CLTQeZrFWmMxIWc/giphy-downsized-small.mp4?cid=898ff9c9kqmag2lo7w1kczmqrntm6ir8jnmckta7zhijijri&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy-downsized-small.mp4&ct=g
ontoiran March 5, 2025 - 4:39 pm
Totally agree. My husband and I started with no money and a closet sized apartment furnish with hand me downs. WE worked very hard for over 40 yrs to change that situation for the better. IF anyone ever told me "I don't own the success" WE have built, they can suck sand!
Zap It March 6, 2025 - 9:53 am
Yeah, my husband and I did too. No one said you don't own the success but if someone starts telling others that they're better than them because they have more money then that's the time they can suck sand.
ontoiran March 6, 2025 - 10:09 am
Dorit deserved that slap down
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 5, 2025 - 5:11 pm
It's so true, something has to suffer because logistically, there just aren't enough hours in the day.
Zap It March 6, 2025 - 9:40 am
And the something is usually the woman...especially the woman who gets diddly squat in a divorce settlement because her X isn't rich or he's a dead beat dad and she doesn't have any job skills to fall back on. So now, she suffers and so do her children. Just saying the flip side.
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 6, 2025 - 2:37 pm
Yes of course that happens, but generally speaking, I think the courts are stacked against the men ... especially where child support is concerned.
Zap It March 6, 2025 - 9:37 am
Okay this is becoming a defensive, tired, age old debate about working mothers vs stay at home mothers. And no, hired hands don't raise the children of working mothers. Their children have the same nannies that Sutton Stracke had. If anyone thinks she was slaving over a hot stove, they would be wrong. By her own admission, she married someone who became wildly successful and she cashed out during her divorce (which she brags about all the time...over 350K a month, most people have to work years to make what her X gives her every month). Which is why SHE said that finally getting a job made her proud and was important to show her and her children that she could manage on her own. Her words.
Champagne Hangover March 6, 2025 - 10:30 am
Her words AFTER she had met or attempted to meet her child rearing obligations AND in their most tender and vulnerable years had a stay at home mother. That said, working mothers who work out of necessity and not ego are exempt from the debate as are those who choose a career path AFTER their child rearing obligations have been met. Those that choose a career not out of necessity but of EGO, WHILE child rearing is still very much unfulfilled thus outsourcing their obligations, do so at the expense of the child almost without exception AT LEAST to some degree. Sorry if that offends you but I stand by what I said and no response will change my view.
Zap It March 6, 2025 - 12:07 pm
I'm not the one who's offended...you are. And I don't care what your opinion is. You're entitled to it just as are others who have a different opinion than you. I don't judge stay at home mothers. Good for you. I also don't judge mothers who work. You do. I posted a comment here and a few got triggered. Too bad. I respect women who manage careers while raising a family. You don't. The difference is, I don't judge. Peace out. ?
Champagne Hangover March 6, 2025 - 1:20 pm
I didn’t judge mothers who work. SAHMs do work, period. That fact aside, I nonetheless explicitly and laboriously stated that those who do work outside of the home out of necessity or after the time of the child’s dependency were exempt. I’m not sure how you arrived at the conclusion that I’m offended but I’m not. I simply have (and rightly so) FAR more respect for those who prioritize their most important duties over ego, greed, self indulgence and self exaltation (I.e. ‘girl bosses’ ??) when such so called ‘success’ comes at the child’s expense which it often (unto inevitability) does to SOME degree. AND let’s be clear: I’m not nor have I ever been a stay at home mom. So, no ‘good for me’ necessary (sincerity aside ?). I’m merely stating truth which not everyone can handle. So be it. It has nothing to do with me, but that I’ve hit a nerve. Shouldn’t be the case cuz there are exceptions to every rule, but…? Have a nice day regardless. ??
Zap It March 6, 2025 - 1:47 pm
Having a career while raising children is not prioritizing a career over children. That's a sweeping generalization. And it doesn't mean that those women who manage both family and career are prioritizing ego, greed etc...men do the same thing all the time and no one points a finger at them. Many continue with their careers for security, rather than risk losing them, because spouses can get sick, die, develop a dependency, become abusive or leave for someone else. Anyway, have a nice day too. ?
Champagne Hangover March 6, 2025 - 3:51 pm
We will have to agree to disagree.
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 5, 2025 - 5:02 pm
I give Jennifer a lot of credit for giving credit where credit's due (say that three times fast:-). Because if anyone could pull off being "$elf-made", it's her. Unlike a certain other thespian in the group, J-Till has had a hell of a movie/TV career.
ontoiran March 5, 2025 - 10:47 am
I hope Boz isn't giving her new friend Dorit legal advice or PK will walk with everything! I haven't seen ANY success from Dorits business ventureS and it appears at time of filming PK is her main source of support.
Champagne Hangover March 5, 2025 - 10:06 am
Boz is becoming more and more insufferable. And she KNOWS any and all tracing of HER wallet strings are safe and sound regardless of any potential dubious merit IF that be the case. (Yeah, I said it. I also said IF. Deal). HOWEVER, regardless of whatever goalposts this so-called ‘girl boss’ ?? wants to move, Sutton’s ‘wallet’ ostensibly came by ENTIRELY legal means. Is that the case for Dorit? ? How much of Dorit’s wallet is co-mingled with PK’s (alleged?) f*ckery? ? Sure, this was a b*tchy and elitist thing for Sutton to say, BUT two things: 1) Truth is a defense. 2) Poke the bear enough and you’ll get mauled. Dorit should have let the mouse go. She didn’t, and received the bitch slap she REPEATEDLY asked for. Should Sutton have risen above it? Sure, but she delivered EXACTLY what Dorit was asking for, so meh…And I’m not unsympathetic to Dorit’s trauma BUT the golden rule still applies. ?
ontoiran March 5, 2025 - 10:31 am
Dorit behaves as if she's the only woman in history ever to be dumped, exactly as a narcissist does. She's been an angry Beverly bitch the entire season. IF this Dorit is the one PK had to deal with I see why he's gone.
Champagne Hangover March 5, 2025 - 11:05 am
I give Dorit SOME grace, I do, BUT Sutton repeatedly warned her, ‘let the mouse go’. Instead of saying to Sutton, ‘let’s sit down like two grown ass women and talk real talk about this mouse’, she doubled and tripled down on her cat with a mouse games. She should have expected retribution whether or not that is the right or righteous thing to do. Everyone has a boiling point. You want a FAFO moment? Keep turning up the f*ckery heat. Human nature is what it is. ?
AnEnigmaWrappedInSnark March 5, 2025 - 3:17 pm
Suffice to say, Poorit didn't marry PK for his sexy bod, and he didn't marry her for her intellect ... and eventually it just ran its course. It has now become crystal clear why LVP was side eyeing that situation.
Evil Queen March 7, 2025 - 8:09 am
PK got sober and ran for the hills. That has to be very humbling for Miss Fashion-Fashion. To think, when PK drank he thought she hung the moon and then he shelves the hooch and now, he can’t stand to live in the same country as Poorit! Sad but funny.
Evil Queen March 7, 2025 - 8:02 am
?! ^^^^^This!
RyNy83 March 5, 2025 - 8:44 am
Yes Boz! took the words out my mouth.
Add Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More