Shannon Beador Suffers Huge Setback In Court Battle With John Janssen

RHOC Star Shannon Beador ‘Blindsided’ by Breakup With Boyfriend John Janssen

Real Housewives of Orange County star Shannon Beador suffers a setback in court cast with ex-boyfriend John Janssen over alleged facelift.

Shannon Beador‘s effort to reduce her ex-boyfriend John Janssen‘s lawsuit against her has been shut down in an Orange County court.

According to court documents obtained by In Touch, a judge recently denied the Real Housewives of Orange County star’s request to remove John Janssen’s allegation of fraud from their ongoing court case.

In a recently filed motion, Shannon Beador’s legal team argued that her ex-boyfriend failed to present enough evidence to back up his claims of promissory fraud.

However, the Orange County businessman’s legal team opposed the motion, insisting that his lawsuit has more than enough evidence to move forward.

Meanwhile, Shannon Beador also argued that her ex’s request for punitive damages and attorney fees be dismissed by the court.

RHOC’s Shannon Beador and John Janssen pose for date night photo at Shannon’s OC home

The Orange County judge presiding over the case denied Shannon’s request to prevent John from seeking punitive damages but did shut down his request to collect attorney fees from the RHOC star. Court documents note that John may refile his motion for attorney fees at a later date.

“My attorney has been in constant communication with his counsel. I agreed to pay John what he wanted because I knew that attorney’s fees would surpass the amount sought, but more importantly to eliminate the negative emotional components that come with a lawsuit. It is important that I continue to focus on the positive aspects of my life and move forward,” Shannon said in the court filing.

As AllAboutTRH previously reported, John is suing Shannon after she reportedly borrowed $75k for a facelift and failed to repay the loan.

Shannon Beador’s title card for season 18 of ‘The Real Housewives of Orange County.’

On March 20, John filed a lawsuit in Orange County Superior Court against Shannon “for breach of oral contract and promissory fraud, among other things, to recover $75,000 he claims she failed to repay him.”

John alleges that the RHOC star “turned to him for financial support in early 2022, borrowing $40,000 via wire transfer on Jan. 23, 2022, for a facelift procedure. Then, on May 20, 2023, he gave her another $35,000 via personal check.”

In the court filing, the OC businessman claims that Shannon agreed to pay back both loans with interest. However, when he attempted to collect the payments in 2023 and 2024, the reality star failed to do so.

John and Shannon dated for nearly four years before splitting in late 2022.

The Real Housewives of Orange County airs on Bravo Thursdays at 9 p.m. ET.

Thoughts on this all? Sound off in the comments!

Related posts

Teddi Mellencamp and Tamra Judge Weigh In with Care on Teresa Giudice’s Reported Tax Troubles

Teddi Mellencamp Says John Mellencamp Has Started Planning Her Burial Following Stage 4 Cancer Diagnosis

Tamra Judge Slams Erika Jayne’s Sharp Comment Toward Garcelle Beauvais at RHOBH Reunion

15 comments

Lolo August 25, 2024 - 11:36 pm
I hope the judge awards Shannon her attorney's fees and more! This dude is an ass! He and Alexis should move on and leave Shannon alone!
BC August 13, 2024 - 9:00 pm
I'm no fan of Jansen at all, but she all but admitted he gave/loaned her the $75k. It kind of flies in the face of her saying that she supported HIM.
Anita Couch August 13, 2024 - 4:53 pm
I hope he never gets a penny.
ontoiran August 13, 2024 - 11:32 am
I get she doesn’t want to burn money on lawyers but, it’s a verbal agreement there’s no proof it was a loan. John would be waiting a very long time to recover his money from me. She doesn’t own property and obviously doesn’t have much else, she should tell the judge she’s willing to pay 50. a month as that’s all she can afford.
BC August 13, 2024 - 9:01 pm
She gets a salary from Housewives.
ontoiran August 14, 2024 - 6:38 am
No doubt. So why is she borrowing money for facelifts and incidentals?
Champagne Hangover August 14, 2024 - 1:33 pm
One answer that makes sense is that she didn’t borrow it. I’m not saying that’s the correct answer or even the ONLY answer that makes sense, but it’s (thus far) the only one that makes sense to me.
ontoiran August 14, 2024 - 5:58 pm
100% agree.
Steve August 13, 2024 - 3:21 pm
If she has agreed to pay him what she owes him, then don't communicate through attorneys, just write him a check and get it over with. And if the attorneys have to be involved, direct them to hand over the check. Once that is done and the check is cashed, the rest of it is moot. Case closed. Everyone can move on. Of course, none of them will get the continued attention that they get by letting this drag on, which is likely the real motivation for not ending this.
Champagne Hangover August 13, 2024 - 4:23 pm
Shannon tried to settle, he rejected the settlement. So, here we are.
ScrappieONE August 13, 2024 - 8:54 pm
She tried to settle on HER TERMS by having him sign an DNA. I wouldn't either in this case because that basically silences him while she can still talk. Just pay him and move on, like Steve said.
Champagne Hangover August 14, 2024 - 8:58 am
My understanding is the NDA would have been mutual. If so (which makes sense because that is often the case) then he rejected the settlement because he’s a greedy scrub hell bent on getting revenge. Fwiw, I wouldn’t settle a civil case for a McDonald’s gift card without an NDA , mutual or otherwise, and neither would you. What Shannon proposed was far from unreasonable and pretty standard. IF John is in any way shape or form entitled to a penny more than Shannon offered, he can prove that in court; and he just might. I’m not saying he won’t, I’m just saying he hasn’t yet. ?
Champagne Hangover August 13, 2024 - 12:07 pm
I don’t know that I’d call this any kind of MAJOR setback. It would have been somewhat of a win had it gone Shannon’s way, sure, but all this means is that his allegation of fraud will be heard. However, he still has to prove that specific allegation with the preponderance of evidence. Now theoretically that means that if it’s 51% more likely than not based on clear and convincing evidence presented in court that Shannon committed fraud then, sure, it’s game over for Shannon. However, all this means is the evidence presented for consideration by the court is admissible NOT that it’s necessarily clear and convincing let alone true. For all we know that evidence could include a couple of lying witnesses and/or communications (texts, emails etc.) which could be interpreted any number of ways. We just don’t know. ???? A judge and/or jury will hear it, though.
Zap It August 13, 2024 - 10:03 am
That's really unfortunate. Shannon, choose better next time. Jansen is a slime ball.
Champagne Hangover August 13, 2024 - 10:10 am
Shannon has a BAD picker!
Add Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More