Lisa Vanderpump’s Husband, Ken Todd, Sued for Almost $1 Million Over Closure of PUMP Restaurant

Vanderpump Rules' Lisa Vanderpump and Ken Todd

More money, more problems! Lisa Vanderpump’s husband, Ken Todd, has been slapped with a lawsuit over the closure of their PUMP restaurant.

Radar Online reports that the property owner of Lisa Vanderpump and Ken Todd‘s now-closed West Hollywood restaurant, PUMP, has sued the British restauranteur for nearly a million dollars in damages.

According to court documents, “the company 8948 Santa Monica Partners sued PUMP LLC and Todd for breach of contract and promissory fraud and conversion.”

In the lawsuit 8948 Santa Monica Partners claims to be the owner of the West Hollywood property where PUMP was located. They explain that the defendants, Lisa and Ken Todd, leased the property in 2013 to create the third establishment in their West Hollywood bar and restaurant empire.

Lisa Vanderpump and Ken Todd (Credit: SplashNews)

Initally, they agreed to pay $32,500 per month in rent. By 2020, the rent increased to around $42,500.

8948 also alleged that, per the lease agreement, Todd and Pump LLC agreed to transfer and convey the Liquor License to 8949 after the lease ended.

However, 8948 claims that Ken Todd lied and never had any intent of following the terms of the lease after it was terminated.

The lawsuit also notes that PUMP continued to occupy the property until July 13, 2023, “at which date Pump surrendered possession of the premises.”

Ken Todd, via Todd and Pump LLC, is also accused of failing to pay rent and other charges totaling  $250k. 8948 also alleges that Ken Todd failed to turn over the Liquor License to them after ending the lease.

Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges: “PUMP has removed from the Premises fixtures and property attached to the Premises (“Fixtures”) including without limitation a customized security gate (“Gate”).”

Per The Blast, 8948 has already secured a new tenant for the property but needs the liquor license in order to allow the restaurant to operate as a full-service bar and restaurant.

“Defendants’ and each of their failure and refusal to reassign, transfer and convey the Liquor License to 8948 will cause 8948 to suffer a loss of approximately $56,500 of base rent and other charges for each month that Defendants fail and refuse to reassign, transfer and convey the Liquor License to 8948. In addition, 8948 will suffer a loss of the value of the Liquor License itself with a current estimated fair market value of $150,000,” the lawsuit read.

Lisa Vanderpump at the opening of PUMP in WeHo

The property owner of the Santa Monica Ave property demands “$750k in damages for the alleged breach of contract and another $200k for refusing to turn over the liquor license and taxing fixtures.”

“We are aggressively pursuing damages, and he will be held fully liable. Nothing this guy won’t do, including skipping out on rent, attempting to unlawfully remove mature trees on the property, stealing our liquor license and patio gates, and ripping chandeliers out of our ceilings. Half of their employees opted to stay with our new tenant for good reason,” the property owner tells Radar Online.

On Thursday, May 4, Lisa Vanderpump announced that PUMP would close its doors for good in July. The WeHo hotspot opened its doors in 2014 to rave reviews.

In a statement to PEOPLE, Lisa said:

“It’s with heavy hearts that we announce that the lease at Pump Restaurant is expiring, and we will be closing its doors on July 5th, after ten years of beautiful evenings under our olive trees.”

As for why PUMP is closing, Lisa blames that on an increase in rent.

“While we have loved our time operating Pump, to take on another 10-year lease with a huge increase in rent by the landlords is not something we are ready to commit to. After successfully running 37+ establishments for many years, this type of rent is untenable.”

The closure of PUMP has been filmed for season 11 of Vanderpump Rules, which is currently in production.

Vanderpump Rules is set to return to Bravo in 2024.

Thoughts on this all? Sound off below!

Related posts

Lala Kent Raves About “Respectful” Encounter with Superbowl Winner & Taylor Swifts Boyfriend Travis Kelce

REPORT: Lisa Vanderpump is Being Pushed Out of Vanderpump Rules – Find Out Why!

Stassi Schroeder Opens Up About ‘Painful’ Falling Out With Jax & Brittany in New Book

8 comments

Steve August 4, 2023 - 3:51 pm
Typical Lisa and Ken. Never have been trustworthy.
Jshappyday August 4, 2023 - 11:23 am
These leasers are lucky they had one of the few establishment that stayed open during Covid. That site was unsuccessful for years, did not have a liquor license before Ken and Lisa took over the property, and they go public with this press just weeks after PUMP closes after ten years of a stable partner.I want to know what kind of increase they tried to insist on for PUMP. The Todd’s left their previous restaurant because they owners played hard ball with rent and that place has been empty now 3 plus year. Ken and Lisa will walk before they let someone take advantage of them. Funny enough it says on the California ABC web site that no ABC license can be promised or used for collateral of any kind, against the law. It says after a termination of a lease agreement and no longer on the property the ABC license must be surrendered after 15 days and then the license holders (the Todd’s) have up to year to either transfer the license to another location or to another name. If it is to another name, the name applicant still would be subject to AB investigation, up to 55-65 days, as it is not an automatic transfer as it is in a different name, the license. (This is straight from the California ABC rules and applications)
Snarky Enigma August 4, 2023 - 3:19 pm
What so no one argues with the landlord? A 33% increase in just a few years is insanity, even for the WeHo cesspool. https://media4.giphy.com/media/iqf1n98f3WgqfbMqNM/giphy-downsized-small.mp4
Amanda August 4, 2023 - 10:54 am
I would like to see the lease. If the Todd's did not obtain the liquor license and it came with the property, then it needs to be transferred. If the Todd's did obtain it, then this is just a money grab by greedy property owners. Also, I guarantee that Lisa installed those chandeliers, trees and the gate. They were not part of the property ahead of time. I would like to see the provisions in the lease that say any and all improvements need to stay.
Sara McCarthy August 4, 2023 - 11:10 am
I agree on all counts
Steve August 4, 2023 - 3:56 pm
Under California Law, the things Lisa and Ken have taken are all part of the property, even if the tenant installed them. The property owner is right to assert ownership. As for the liquor license, also under CA law, the property owner must give approval for the issuance of a liquor license for the property. And the license is attached to the specific property and cannot be simply used anywhere else. So, it is normal practice that a property owner will allow the license only if the tenant agrees to transfer the license to the owner so it can continue to be used at the property it is issued for,
Ginger Snap August 5, 2023 - 6:34 pm
The liquor license goes back to the state. The state has to investigate the new person obtaining the license. It isn’t tied to property.
Jshappyday August 6, 2023 - 3:54 am
Exactly- must be turned over within 15 days once the establishment is closed due to the lease agreement termination. A liquor license can never be “promised” as terms of a deal or arrangement exactly like the prior PUMP lease property owner is alluding too. That is specifically against the law/regulations and since this is the 37th Bar and Restaurant Ken has done, he surely knows the California ABC regulations. They have a year to transfer it to a different party or location, but that party is basically reapplying for a whole new Application. For a Liquor License you can not just pass the baton like Willy Wonka with a Golden ticket…both the person and site have to be investigated, and in person, not by mail.
Add Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read More